4 Plants Cup Full Results
Below you can find the reviews submitted for each category, and the breakdown of the final scores. We won’t post the competitor names publicly, but feel free to utilize your bragging rights (or hide, if you got a low score) yourself!
*Note: The grid full breakdown looks best on a desktop, but the winners are noted below for convenience.
First Place - Pro Outdoor - # 4
Congratulations to competitor number #969121928 who submitted cultivar #4 to the Pro Outdoor category! Here is what we know about this cultivar:
- Old Family Purple
- Grown in Kincardine, Ontario
Second Place - Pro Outdoor - # 1
Congratulations to competitor #954047802 who submitted cultivar #1 to the Pro Outdoor category. Here is what we know about this cultivar:
- Cookies & Cream
- Grown in Duncan, British Columbia
- Won first in terms of bonus points rewarded in retrospective reviews
Third Place - Pro Outdoor - # 2
Congratulations to competitor #973961436 who submitted cultivar #2 to the Pro Outdoor category. Here is what we know about this cultivar:
- Grown in Pemberton, Ontario
- We’re working on getting some extra info on this submission!
Congratulations also to the 4 contestants that submitted dried cannabis to the Pro Outdoor category and made it through to the final round. Each contestant will receive an email in the coming days identifying which cultivar submission was theirs. Even if you did not do well, please know that your participation is acknowledged, appreciated, and that together we will grow even better. This is a community, and you’ll learn new growing techniques the more you do it!
Prizes and details will be released as soon as possible and communicated directly with the winners. 4 Plants Cup 2020 will be announced later this month.
Below you can find the reviews submitted for each category, and the breakdown of the final scores. We won’t post the competitor names publicly, but feel free to utilize your bragging rights yourself!
A very important side note about this category: we unfortunately had to disqualify a contestant in this round. Multiple judges maintained that this outdoor submission must have been indoor, and unfortunately, with no social media or journal submission, only one questionable picture as proof, and 0 submitted reviews by this contestant, we had no choice but to disqualify the submission. You can still see the full breakdown below, but you can also filter out the ‘not counted’ scores for a more accurate picture of the submissions. You will also see an addition of submission #6 that is also not counted in this round; this extra submission is included just for fun as we had to ask the wonderful PancakeNap to jump in and help judge this category since only 2/5 competitors submitted reviews, and he would have submitted in this category if he didn’t back out to facilitate repackaging. For next round, we think we want him to compete – what do you think?
The four charts below are split up like so:
Pro Outdoor Full Results – this is a breakdown of all the options. Grouped by submission name, you can compare each review for each submission, with the total from the first round, the bonus points from the second round, and the final score. In this way, you can compare the first and retrospective rounds side by side.
First Round Comparison – this is the first round only. Grouped by any one of the cultivar ratings – visuals – the trim, structure, bag appeal; tactile – compressive feel and fragility; olfaction – expanse, magnitude, pungency, and composition of smell; and gustation – the dynamism, distinguishability, and longevity of taste – allows you to compare how different growers judged the same product. .
Retrospective Round Comparison – this is the second round only. Grouped by any one of the retrospective ratings – specifically the smoke/smoothness and effect, or the bonus points, you can cross compare cultivars and reviews.
Pro Outdoor Gallery – this is a view of all the submissions for this category, where they’re grown, and what we know about the cultivar.